Quote of the Day

more Quotes
Showing posts with label freelance copy editor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freelance copy editor. Show all posts

Monday, December 2, 2013

A US Copy Editor's Perspective: Prefixes DO NOT TAKE HYPHENS IN GENERAL USAGE


Most prefixes don't take hyphens when joined with a word. There are exceptions, but, if you always take out the hyphen, you'll be right many more times than you'll be wrong.

If you want to know a tad more about the exceptions, then leave in the hyphen when two Is (anti-inflammatory for example) or two As (intra-arterial) come together. This is generally correct all the time. 16CMS* 7.85. However, when two Es fall together, look up each such conjoined word in Web11**. This combo seems to have many more exceptions, such as these dictionary entries: preemergence yet pre-engineered.

Also anytime a prefix or suffix is added to a proper noun, a hyphen (or sometimes an N-dash) is needed.

Back to prefixes in general.

In Web11, you'll find these prefixes listed with a hyphen following each entry: anti-, bi-, mid-, pre-, etc., but THE HYPHEN IS JUST TO HIGHLIGHT ITS PREFIX CAPABILITY. DO NOT USE THE HYPHEN WHEN JOINING WORDS TO THESE PREFIXES in general. Just like when looking up other words within Web11, you'll find "distinguisher" elements depending on how the word is used: adverb, adjective, preposition, etc. So the prefix form may be designated by the hyphen after (or the hyphen before when speaking of suffixes), but that is all it is. An identifier. Remember "less" is a word in and of itself, and yet "-less" is the suffix form. Again the hyphen (before or after) is just to highlight how this particular prefix/suffix entry is available for joining with other words. WITHOUT THE HYPHEN. Here are four examples taken directly from Web11: childless, witless, dauntless, fadeless.

Can you tell this is a particular pet peeve of mine? Ha! We all have them. This is one of mine. But it also makes me a great copy editor.

And I share this knowledge to help make your manuscripts shine with a professional polish. Best wishes and many successes to us all.

*CMS = The Chicago Manual of Style, Sixteenth Edition
**Web11 = Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Eleventh Edition

Denise Barker, author + blogger + copy editor
amazon.com/author/denisebarker

Sunday, December 1, 2013

A US Copy Editor's Perspective: What Are the Two Most Common Errors Found in Manuscripts?

Hyphens and commas.

Hyphens

The majority of the errors of the first can be corrected simply by consulting Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Eleventh Edition (Web11), either manually or possibly from selecting Web11 as your default dictionary within Windows 8 or Microsoft Word (MSWord) 2013. Since I have neither, I am going by secondhand info here.

However, I do know firsthand that my MSWord 2010 edition does not have Web11 as its default for spell-checking functions, because there are misspelled words that are overlooked and correct words that have suggested spelling options given for them.

I bought a hard copy of Web11 and uploaded on my computer the disk that came with it. I use the resident soft copy as it's great and much faster than any free online Internet version while that remains as an option. Remember also that the online version does not give you full access to all the Web11 entries that are within the hard copy or its soft copy.

There are many hyphenation exceptions (like when two As or two Is are run together, and sometimes when two Es are found side by side), but your copy editor can help out there for all you Indie authors.

Of course the Web11 is for US authors. UK authors and others around the globe have their own preferred reference and style guides.

Commas

In general there are five easy rules for authors to know about in dealing with commas. The rest can be covered when your copy editor reviews your manuscripts. Here's my choice five:

16CMS 6.24 (paraphrased): Parenthetical elements midsentence take a pair of commas. Example: I was, at the least, mortified. NOTE: This sentence still makes perfect sense when you delete the phrase, the pair of commas and what was in between. Ending up with this: I was mortified.

16CMS 6.25 (paraphrased): The only one-word intros that require commas are: therefore, indeed and however. Example: However, I was tired. NOTE: When internally placed, a pair of commas is needed (per 16CMS 6.24 above). As in: I was, however, tired. Otherwise I would suggest no commas for other single words, especially with stand-alone LY-ending adverbs, unless for a pause effect or to add clarity for the reader.

16CMS 6.28 (paraphrased): If you have two complete sentences (each with its own subject and verb) that are conjoined by a conjunction, then a comma must precede the conjunction. Example: I had to run to the store for bread, but I needed to leave soon to avoid traffic. NOTE: Here is an exception example: I suppose that you know what you are doing and you can be trusted. Technically "I suppose that" is shared by both parts of this sentence, with "I" as the shared noun and "suppose" as the shared verb, so no comma is needed before its conjunction "and."

16CMS 6.29 (paraphrased): If a noun is shared within two clauses conjoined by a conjunction, no comma is needed before the conjunction. Example: I had to run to the store for bread and would need to leave soon to avoid traffic. NOTE: "I" is the shared noun here. Because each phrase is not a complete sentence on its own, no comma precedes the conjunction "and" here (as also discussed in 16CMS 6.28 above).

16CMS 6.36 (paraphrased): If your intro phrase has a verb in it, then a comma should follow that phrase. Example: If you had not driven me, I am sure I would have gotten lost.

Again there are many exceptions within 16CMS as to usages of commas (like none are needed around Jr. or Sr. or III as referring to names). These your copy editor can address.

In Closing

Per 16CMS 7.85, "In general, Chicago [Manual of Style] prefers a spare hyphenation style..."

Per 16CMS 6.16, the comma is for "a slight pause" or for "ease of reading."

As a copy editor and an Indie author, I am very interested in making our Indie manuscripts as professional as possible. To that end I believe both author and copy editor alike should always consult Web11 first, then 16CMS second, especially if you are an Indie author who is not a copy editor and has also chosen not to use such services. Whether you attempt to tackle the five comma rules above is up to you and how much you love learning more about our English language as used here in the States. But if you do, you will have given your manuscript an undeniable polish.

Best wishes to all.

Denise Barker, author + blogger + copy editor
amazon.com/author/denisebarker

Saturday, July 6, 2013

Margie Lawson's Writing Body Language and Dialogue Cues Like a Psychologist

Long ago I bought the class notes ($22) bearing the title as noted above from Margie's website at http://www.margielawson.com/. Today I finally read the whole of it (all 164 pages). I really thought I had done this once before and therefore designated today, this morning only, for a review of what I had underlined therein.  But I was wrong. I had previously gotten as far as Lesson 2.

And, yes, as Margie states, taking one of her classes is akin to a college course. Thankfully my mind was in prime gear today, and I could handle all ten lectures prefaced by the welcome intro and finished off by a wrap-up session in the same day.

This class was highly informative, as usual. Being an author, I needed to expand my body language repertoire. Even as a freelance copy editor, I see too many nods, raised eyebrows, glares/stares/gazes and sighs going on, maybe two in a row just a return apart. Sometimes one can be deleted without notice or replacement. But others need a substitute body language response, so this will help me in that endeavor.

I've got "repetition" radar like Margie has cliché detection.

I really enjoyed her lie-detector sections and her two quizzes in this offering. There is also a quick review of some rhetorical devices more fully covered in her class notes for Deep Editing: The EDITS System, Rhetorical Devices and More, which I recommend first. Then take her Empowering Characters' Emotions followed by this class.

You will need to set aside vacation time to get through the EDITS one. Be forewarned. Some of her class notes are three hundred pages long, and each page may stump you, requiring a reread with the music off and the door to your home office closed in order to assimilate her teachings.

But once her messages pass your brain barrier, you will see your work and others' on another level or fifteen.

I just now ordered the class notes for Digging Deep into the EDITS System and look forward to getting into that one.

If you need help more on an inspirational level, check out her class notes entitled Defeat Self-Defeating Behaviors. Also check out FLYLady.net for insight into getting things done, fifteen minutes at a time on a daily basis.

The last offering within Margie's class notes' section is Powering Up Body Language in Real Life. I haven't taken this one, but I'm sure it would be great.

For those of you on a budget, the class notes are inexpensive and can sit in your in-bin until you are ready to go back to school. While you are visiting her website, you can sign up for her weekly newsletter and check out her in-person classes.

Enjoy!

Denise Barker, author + blogger + copy editor

Friday, June 28, 2013

Raymond Chandler's Philip Marlowe

I'm in love with a dead author who wrote about an equally enticing 1940s-style detective.

I bought a collection of four Philip Marlowe stories and read one a night for four consecutive nights. I rushed to devour each tale and then saddened to see the final page. Now I'm trying to study each one. But it's hard. Because I keep getting sucked into the story.

His style is charismatic. Here are a few samples:
  1. USING NEGATIVES: ...with the sun not shining and a look of hard wet rain in the clearing of the foothills (p. 3, The Big Sleep).
  2. IRONY AND HUMOR: I was neat, clean, shaved and sober, and I didn't care who knew it (p. 3, The Big Sleep).
  3. UNIQUE: I was calling on four million dollars (p. 3, The Big Sleep).
  4. CHOICE WORDS: ...didn't have any clothes on but some very long and convenient hair (p. 3, The Big Sleep).
Notice the page numbers referenced above? All these gems came from one page of one book of Chandler's.

Wow.

And instead of kicking me out of his novels with his in-your-face style, it draws me closer. How is that?

I can only proffer one theory at the moment: sincerity. He wrote from such a depth of honesty that it has to resonate with his readers.

I want to do that.

Anyway, this is a short post today, but I hope you enjoy Raymond Chandler's words as much as I do.



Denise Barker, author + blogger + copy editor

Saturday, June 22, 2013

James Scott Bell's Plot and Structure

DISCLAIMER: I took a full sixteen double-sided handwritten pages of notes culled from my highlights on my Kindle. So much of the below is paraphrased from Bell's words. When I knew it was a direct quotation, I indented same. Any personal opinions of mine appended herein should be obvious.

Now for the best parts.

Here's another how-to book regarding the art of our craft which is recommended reading for all. There is something for each author in this text.

Bell starts off his book with an apt quote:

I have the typewriter and I have white paper and I have me and that should add up to a novel. William Saroyan

Amen.

Then Bell proceeds to tell us to write fresh, which is the key to originality, which lies within us and comes from who we really are. See my earlier post this month where I really took off on this concept. But Bell summarizes it to mean we should pick an issue we care about, not some mediocre idea that births no emotions. Robert Ludlum said, "I think arresting fiction is written out of a sense of outrage." So the author is seen as a moral voice. Use yours.

Write about what you are passionate about, something you are burning to tell. Playing it safe leads to flat writing. What does your novel ultimately mean? Every story has a meaning. So does every author. Good artists create out of deep and honest concern, a vision of life...that is worth pursuing.

If you stay true to your own awe, your books cannot help being charged with meaning. That's not just a great way to write, it's a great way to live.

Sounds easy, doesn't it? This should be the facile part as we are all individuals. However, I find it hard letting loose, not protecting my ideas and words from my internal editor much less the awaiting critics.

Character first, Bell says. I happen to agree as a pantstering character-driven author type. Obsession by its nature pushes a character to action. So give your main character an obsession and see where it takes him or her. The stronger your characters, the better your plot as the lead provides access to the plot. [Or as I argue below, character = plot.]

The most compelling fiction has death hanging over the lead. It could be physical death or a psychological death to his very well-being or could be a professional death as in "you'll never work again in this town."

If needed, use every human emotion to stir your readers. Also, when writing "hot" as Bell calls it, you will have plenty to say, no writer's block on your horizon. To help you out, here is a compilation of various feelings found via the internet:

  • anger
  • fear
  • envy
  • shame
  • pity
  • indignation
  • surprise
  • wonder
  • happiness
  • courage
  • amusement
  • modesty
  • pain
  • pleasure
  • caution
  • respect
  • love
  • hope
  • faith
  • confusion
  • disgust
  • confidence
  • contempt
  • grief

As per Plot and Structure, Bell notes the first reaction is an emotion. The character then considers (internal thoughts) followed by a decision which leads to action (including dialogue) he undertakes. Plus we all have doubts and inner conflicts. Even if we feel we must win, lack of confidence often bubbles to the surface.

Bell states we love the underdog who overcomes (think Rocky), plus a lead who sacrifices his objective for the better good is also beloved (think Casablanca). Bell offers this wonderful overview of the two types of sacrifices: one is of CHOICE and involves the moral courage to sacrifice his personal goal whereas the other is of BATTLE and requires physical courage to sacrifice his safety.

I love his three rules: (1) act first, explain later; (2) even when you do explain, give only 10%; and (3) set your info/backstory inside confrontation. Another should be his later axiom: keep the readers worried.

Something must matter in every scene. So think of the worst thing that could happen to your lead from the outside, from the inside and even from the world (example: war, strike, famine, plague, hurricane, etc.). Bring to light his dark secrets. Or one of his loved one's. Add more complications in the form of another character, another subplot, a romantic element, etc. A scene needs conflict or it is dull.

Cutting almost always improves your book. Great final editing tip. Another nugget of wisdom from Bell is his "last page resonance" theory. We must affix a feeling to the reader's soul with our final words. This leads to sales of our next books. A fast-moving story is a good thing; one that lingers inside the reader long after is another.

I love themes and Bell concurs stating characters carry theme. Always. So develop yours (may have to be after the first draft is written), decide what is the take-home value for your story? The lesson or insight? The new way of seeing things? Theme emerges without effort in your plot. Bell feels the character arc is part of the subplot. I would have to differ with him here. To me, it is the plot. Maybe because I'm character-driven as an author that I see it this way.

Bell also believes the classics prevail due to their unusual penetration into human character, keeping them fresh and alive. That what makes a plot truly memorable is not all the action but what the action does to the character, what changes he makes. [Which proves my point above about the character arc is the plot.]

However, Bell continues by stating when characters grow they deepen the plot. A strong character arc will enhance any plot. In Bell's words, the plot is the action happening externally while the character arc takes note of what's going on internally. I see it more as action/reaction, cause/effect. I say potato, he says...

Speaking of produce, he has a great layers (as in onions) approach to our core selves. The layers get softer (easier to change) as they move away from our central idea of self. From outer to inner, they are opinions, dominant attitudes, values, core beliefs, then our self-image at the very center.

Here is another great quote, about one of his beloved characters in his Left Behind series, courtesy of Jerry Jenkins:

I didn't kill him off. I found him dead.

That is priceless.

Since I'm a pantster taking dictation from my main characters, or a hybrid plotter at best, I do some of Bell's plotting instruction. I'm also a fan of the Snowflake Pro software, which starts off with a one-sentence summary of my book, then a one-paragraph version, then a back blurb version, on to some of the major plot points as set forth by Campbell, then graduates into chapter summaries which are then written out as first drafts.

Only I've been known to do the process backward. Writing first drafts totally by the seat of my pants. Works for me. For my lead characters, I like the adjective + noun descriptor tied to one emotion and maybe an archetype. All to keep me on track as I follow my characters around.

I really enjoyed Bell's approach to revision as something to strengthen my novel. Addressing clarity issues, dragging middles, cuts to be made and additional info/action needed. Remember to use contractions in dialogue and to employ transitions to avoid jerkiness.

Bell lists some of the main plot patterns and discusses each: the Quest, Revenge/Justice, Adventure, the Chase, One Against (hero type), One Apart (the anti-hero), Power (at a moral cost) and Allegory.

Here's another gem from Bell: the craft of writing is largely solving problems. You write; then you solve.

At the end of this wonderful collection of writing tips is the homework to set aside eight to twelve weeks for. It's a study of your particular genre, and I'm anxious to start mine. But I'm the eternal student and love assignments such as these. Bell even has a back cover blurb formula to go by.

This book is worthy to sit among your private collection at home. Take a weekend to read the whole of it. Then take another couple days to find the salient points for your particular style. Make a checklist and keep it by your writing desk. Best wishes all!



Denise Barker, author + blogger + copy editor


Self-Editing for Fiction Writers: How to edit yourself into print

LOVE this book from Renni Browne and Dave King. To say it is only a developmental look at a manuscript is to limit it. While it is not on a copy editor's level per se (confirming when to use semicolons in lieu of colons or commas), the text does address some grammar and language usage that I correct on a freelance level. Yet Self-Editing for Fiction Writers goes beyond both to encompass style and voice and to differentiate between the two.

Read it. Whether you are a traditionally pubbed author or an Indie, like me, your work will benefit from the knowledge contained in these 267 pages or 280 pages if you count all the back matter.

And who would have thought to put cartoons into a nonfiction piece? Evidently Browne and King. I adore the George Booth cartoons! What a stroke of brilliance to add them and what a stroke of genius on the artist's part to portray the author's mentality in one frame. Beautiful minds at work.

Here are some highlights which spoke to me specifically or are those universal tips that need to be mentioned again for all of us:

  • Names of People and Places. Connect with your readers by naming characters and locales. My writing is contemporary in that anyplace-will-work world. Still...I find myself reading others' works and wondering about the setting. Details help with the mood, too. I'm lean on description to the point of morphing my generic city to no place, a nonexistent nowhereness. But these co-authors have made me rethink that position.
  • Show vs. Tell. There's a place for both. Exposition/narration (maybe backstory?) engages your reader's intellect. But you want to engage their emotions with scenes incorporating action and thoughts and dialogue.
  • Contrast. This can be on many levels, in assorted applications. Like using tell not show as a transition to link two scenes that are aided by the contrasting pace. You can also pit two unlike characters in a chapter to highlight their differences.
  • Backstory/Answers. You don't want to give your readers info; you want to give them experiences. Resist the urge to explain. Make the reader wait for answers. Spread them out over the length of your novel.
  • Deep POV. This shows the world as your character sees it, through his filters and his beliefs and his experiences. Masters at this move the reader effortlessly from seeing the world through the character's eyes to seeing the world through the character's mind and back again. Seamless transitions. Thoughts as if dialogue.
  • Diversion. This is such a great tool that I am failing miserably at using. Thanks to this wonderful book, I have been reminded. Misdirection falls in here, too.
  • Copyediting Tips. Cut out LY words. Stick to "he said" or no dialogue tags at all. Reduce italics. Per Browne and King, avoid ING and AS phrases since they tend to remove the reader by lessening this action plus can cause logistical problems. At least, vary the positioning of the ING phrases. Move them to the end of the sentence or the middle.
  • Beats. This equates to action in its many forms. Yet too many are what Margie Lawson calls "walking the dog" and what these authors call condescending to your reader. Too little are disembodying and disorienting. Beats can also be used for pacing but don't be interruptive with too many. Utilize beats for deepening the emotional content. Especially when in contrast to what is said via dialogue. Browne and King give a great example of a unique beat: blew his nose on a sheet. I have a vivid mental picture of this guy from one minor act that spiderwebs in my mind into so many other details about his person and personality.
  • Conflict. As Donald Maass says, have conflict on every page. Which these authors state is one of the simplest storytelling tools: to reinforce the tension of your story.
  • Repetitions. This can occur on many levels: by word, phrase, sentence, body language, chapter info, plot device. Vary your sentence constructions. What out for those repetitive paragraph/chapter beginnings and endings. Cut those reps! We are creative folks. Surely we can find another word or many more verbal tics or visual tells for our characters to act out. And we don't need three scenes among different parties that tell our reader the same thing. Once your reader knows, skip the retelling in whatever form.
  • Multiple Uses. If each element of your story accomplishes one thing only, then your story will subtly, almost subliminally, feel artificial.
  • Style and Voice. These authors note style and voice are not interchangeable. Every author has or can have a literary style, but by no means does every author have a literary voice. Again the way to develop voice is not by working on your style. When your style overshadows your story, it's defeating its purpose. Your primary purpose as a fiction author is to engage your readers in your story the best way you can. That's voice.
This review does not do justice to the book. I highly recommend it for all authors, newbie or seasoned, trad-pubbed or Indie. Your writing will be better, stronger, more efficient, multilayered.

This book also has many checklists or exercises at the end of its chapters along with a recommended reading section at the back. Do yourself a huge favor. Read this!



Denise Barker, author + blogger + copy editor
 

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Authors, Here's an Opening Paragraph Example

I mentioned this in a post months ago and bemoaned not being able to find the one I sought. Well, in printing out my WIPs, and thereafter reading them, I found it!

So, courtesy of one of Sandy Blair's wonderful online classes (SandyBlair.net), here it is, a fantastic opening paragraph example:
Chapter 1
Spring 1411
While smoke from a dozen rush torches wafted about the rafters like worried ghosts, Ian MacKay studied the men and women milling about Stirling's great hall. Each, he'd decided long ago, was either flint or kindling. Each, whether they kenned it or not, had the capacity to turn Scotland into a raging inferno.
Something he'd willingly die to prevent.
Wow! Isn't that amazing what this brilliant author (also Sandy Blair, from her book A Thief in a Kilt) revealed to her reader with only sixty-three words.

Normally, we authors take longer to set up the integral who, what, when, where, why, howmuch less the hero's goal, his fears, planting seeds for the black moment. But this excerpt ups the ante for me.

Since I write contemporary, I don't have worlds to contend with per se. In fact, I consider my world pretty generic to any country or people as I deal with the universality of emotions. Therefore I don't always note the geographic locale. If I were a fantasy or sci-fi author, that would be more of an issue. A necessary character even. But not so much for my romance genre.

As a Deep South gal, I do have southern settings and, if not boldly declared, give hints with food, architecture, speech. But my stories could be had in a snowbound cabin in Oregon as well. I'm just not familiar with that part of our country, so I stick with what I know.

Anyway, I hope you love my example as much as I do. Better yet, I hope it spurs you on in your own writing.


Denise Barker, author + blogger + copy editor

Friday, March 29, 2013

Why You Should Quit

Here is a link to wonderful article that I would recommend everyone read: http://www.insightoftheday.com/quotetext.asp?msgid=2310.

Courtesy of Bob Proctor's Insight of the Day.

Written by: Jason Leister.
Jason is a direct response copywriter, internet entrepreneur and editor of the daily e-letter, The Client Letter, where he empowers independent professionals who work with clients. He has six children and lives and works by the lake in Minnesota.

Enjoy!




Denise Barker, author + blogger + copy editor